Skip to main content

Could be Facebook a good tool for students' engagement?

Honestly, I have never taken into account Facebook as a potential tool for teaching and learning. I would never recommend to be friend with your students, and vice versa would never expect that students' would be friends with their teachers. Simply put, there are too many private aspects that it is good to keep separated between students and teachers. With my great surprise, I instead discovered a rich literature on the topic: it is at least 10 years that there exist empirical observations on the adoption and effects of Facebook in teaching and learning activities [1]. In particular, the typical way of working is to create groups for a course: with the right settings, group members are only students, possibly together with teachers, without the need of being friends on Facebook [2]. This indeed is a reasonable approach, that alleviates a lot of the doubts related to privacy, both for the teacher and the students: in fact, a group creates a kind of private island on Facebook where students and teachers can discuss and share material while avoiding the issues related to privacy. Notably, a group can be completely hidden to the rest of Facebook users and the access can be granted upon invitation.

Image found somewhere on the web

From an engagement perspective, using Facebook looks promising for enhancing students' interests. Everyone uses this social network, there is no need to install other apps, or to have a special account on a laptop. Even more interesting, it has been noticed that using Facebook implicitly creates a mixture of classroom and social life, which promotes a sense of community. In turn, the community building improves the learning climate, which is considered a positive factor for teaching and learning. This is undoubtedly a nice side-effect, and as a matter of fact my personal experiences with other virtual forums is that students tend to show low interactions with official communication means. Or, in other words, they see official platforms as a way of grading and/or tracking study activities, so they avoid them in the same way they are typically reluctant in publicly asking questions or volunteering to answer a question from the teacher.

The potential drawbacks of adopting Facebook as part of the course delivery is first of all the usual risks of using a social network: exclusion of certain students, inappropriate messages, mobbing, etc. These problems are strictly related to the trade-off between teacher-managed and self-managed groups: research studies have suggested that the presence of teachers should be limited or completely avoided [3, 4]. In this way, the mentioned issues are difficult to control. 

To conclude, a Facebook group with low/no teacher presence looks not that much as an engagement tool for learning straightaway, rather a nicer communication means for students that could use it to self-organise, and maybe also discuss course topics among other things.

1. Chugh, R., Ruhi, U. Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Educ Inf Technol 23, 605–616 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9621-2 

2. Michael Todorovic, Elisabeth Coyne, Vinod Gopalan, Youn Oh, Lila Landowski & Matthew Barton (2020) Twelve tips for using Facebook as a learning platform, Medical Teacher, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1854708

3. Toker, S., Baturay, M.H. What foresees college students’ tendency to use facebook for diverse educational purposes?. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 16, 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0139-0

4. Johannesen, M., Mifsud, L. & Øgrim, L. Identifying Social Presence in Student Discussions on Facebook and Canvas. Tech Know Learn 24, 641–657 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9362-3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Open Networked Learning: final reflections

  When I registered for this course and expressed my expectations, I wrote that I was seeking for the holy grail of students' engagement. Moreover, in an internal workshop at my university (Mälardalen University, MDU), I told that my impression about ONL was about a meta-course, that is a course that teaches you about course design through a course. Now that we reached the end I can say that my expectations have been fulfilled, even though not in the way I was expecting. Indeed, I believe to have gotten at least a clearer picture and a plan about a possible way to engage more students in their learning process. In my opinion, the mean is learning communities: if I manage to create adequate learning communities and convince the students to actively contribute in their communities, this will on one hand engage everyone more in learning, and will also make course contents more interesting for the students. When it comes to the meta-course expectation, indeed ONL has been a meta-course

Learning in communities: do our students know how it works?

  After more than a month through the course on Open Networked Learning (ONL), the webinar on Learning Communities [1] and some of the suggested literature for the topic [2, 3] stimulated some reflections on courses organisation and current (frustrating) experiences with students and group assignments. These reflections start from my own experience with this ONL course: me, and with many of the members in my group (and so I guess it happened also for other groups), felt kind of disoriented with respect to the assignments and the way of working. We have been given some problem/context to work on, but apart from that we have been given freedom to self-organise and decide on what to concretely investigate. My personal opinion is that even ourselves, the teachers, are kind of unused to this type of advanced collaboration: not a simple cooperative work, where everyone is assigned a specific task, rather a real collaborative effort, where everyone contributes to the construction of group kno