Skip to main content

Open Networked Learning: final reflections

 When I registered for this course and expressed my expectations, I wrote that I was seeking for the holy grail of students' engagement. Moreover, in an internal workshop at my university (Mälardalen University, MDU), I told that my impression about ONL was about a meta-course, that is a course that teaches you about course design through a course. Now that we reached the end I can say that my expectations have been fulfilled, even though not in the way I was expecting. Indeed, I believe to have gotten at least a clearer picture and a plan about a possible way to engage more students in their learning process. In my opinion, the mean is learning communities: if I manage to create adequate learning communities and convince the students to actively contribute in their communities, this will on one hand engage everyone more in learning, and will also make course contents more interesting for the students.

When it comes to the meta-course expectation, indeed ONL has been a meta-course, but we have been fully/personally involved in the changes required for our courses. Indeed, as noticed also after topic 3, learning communities demand a change of approach in how students participate in group work. The fact that us teachers found ourselves kind of disoriented at the beginning of the course says it all about what kind of change in the mindset is needed. In this respect, one important aspect to take care of in my own courses will be "educate" the students to create learning communities and hence see clearly the benefits. During the discussions in our group, we reflected and discussed a lot about possible guidelines on how to create the basis for learning communities: start with specific assignments, create small groups, give engaging/open assignments that require the inputs from all the group components, create individual assignments to share the knowledge with the rest of the class and assess the learning of all the students. This sharing activity can be potentially used also for self-assessment, notably for intermediate tasks.

In a broader perspective, this course also stimulated some additional reflections about potential ways of delivering distance courses in fully asynchronous scenarios: in these cases, the power of learning communities is reduced given that each student goes at her/his own pace, so it should be found a suitable solution for establishing such communities. Intuitively, I would think to social networks as a possible solution to this problem, which is definitely interesting and worth further investigations.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Openness in Education: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

 I am part of the generation that fully experimented the transition into the Web era: from the primordial telephone-line based connections towards more and more bandwidth capable connections, until nowadays data connections available even on mobile devices. Since the beginning, the Web was perceived as a place of freedom, mainly because of the free-of-charge sharing of contents. However, this virtual business model started to be unsustainable as soon as it impacted the real world business (just take as example all the entertainment market, i.e. tv, music, and movies). As a consequence, content providers had to find a way to charge virtual consumers when these ones became the majority of all the customers. Image taken somewhere on the Web I wanted to start my reflections on openness in education with the previous historical premise since I see a lot of similarities between them, and indeed a lot of reflections about openness in education are inspired to what...
Post a Comment
Read more

Learning in communities: do our students know how it works?

  After more than a month through the course on Open Networked Learning (ONL), the webinar on Learning Communities [1] and some of the suggested literature for the topic [2, 3] stimulated some reflections on courses organisation and current (frustrating) experiences with students and group assignments. These reflections start from my own experience with this ONL course: me, and with many of the members in my group (and so I guess it happened also for other groups), felt kind of disoriented with respect to the assignments and the way of working. We have been given some problem/context to work on, but apart from that we have been given freedom to self-organise and decide on what to concretely investigate. My personal opinion is that even ourselves, the teachers, are kind of unused to this type of advanced collaboration: not a simple cooperative work, where everyone is assigned a specific task, rather a real collaborative effort, where everyone contributes to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could be Facebook a good tool for students' engagement?

Honestly, I have never taken into account Facebook as a potential tool for teaching and learning. I would never recommend to be friend with your students, and vice versa would never expect that students' would be friends with their teachers. Simply put, there are too many private aspects that it is good to keep separated between students and teachers. With my great surprise, I instead discovered a rich literature on the topic: it is at least 10 years that there exist empirical observations on the adoption and effects of Facebook in teaching and learning activities [1]. In particular, the typical way of working is to create groups for a course: with the right settings, group members are only students, possibly together with teachers, without the need of being friends on Facebook [2]. This indeed is a reasonable approach, that alleviates a lot of the doubts related to privacy, both for the teacher and the students: in fact, a group creates a kind of private island on Facebook where ...
Post a Comment
Read more